This month sees the release of the Seventh Biannual Mediation Manchester Audit, which reveals some intriguing shifts in previous trends.
The latest study predicts 10,000 cases each year, a little rise from the 9,500 instances projected for 2021. According to the study, 70 percent of cases are sent directly to individual mediators rather than through providers, with 145 mediators performing 85 percent of the work (about 40 cases each per year).
54% of mediators believe themselves to be’reasonably’ or’very’ experienced, but only 40% of mediators consider themselves to be full-time mediators. Over fifty percent of this group report doing less than ten mediations each year.
35 percent of mediators are female, with a median age of 50 for women and 57 for males (increased from 26 percent in 2021). The majority of this increase, however, appears to be among the ‘novice’ category of mediators, where the percentage increased from 30% to 42%.
Despite a minor improvement in diversity data compared to 2014, 92 percent of responders are white mediators.
For the first time, fewer than fifty percent of respondents held a law degree (43 percent ). In recent years, there has been a dramatic decline in the number of attorneys in the advanced category (2012: 70 percent ; 2014: 60 percent ; 2016: 57 percent ). According to the survey, this is attributable to the growing effect of other professionals entering the market, as opposed to a decline in the number of attorneys entering the market.
Criteria for employment
Both mediators and the attorneys who appoint them continue to regard “professional reputation- experience/status” as the most important criterion when selecting a mediator. Professional credentials and experience are ranked second by mediators (lawyers put this at fifth). In contrast, attorneys prioritise ‘professional reputation – Mediation Manchester style’ (with mediators putting this at fifth). There is a comparable disparity in costs (ranked fourth by attorneys and seventh by mediators) and availability (lawyers at sixth, mediators at fourth).
Both mediators and attorneys have raised the significance they place on “sector experience,” which is currently rated third by both.
It appears that mediations are becoming increasingly difficult. There are indications that mediations are taking longer. Although the overall settlement rate has remained same at 86%, the number of mediations that are resolved on the same day has decreased from 75% to 67%. Those settling immediately after Mediation Manchester have increased from 11 percent to 19 percent. There is no explanation for this development, however it may be related to the de facto requirement for parties to mediate in lieu of risking unfavourable costs rulings. Anecdotally, mediators remark that parties attend mediations because they are compelled to and are not always interested. However, the numbers suggest that even if this is the case, settlements are still reached, although later in the day, indicating that the procedure is effective, if not necessarily quickly.
Lawyers’ and clients’ performance in mediations
Mediators say that 69 percent of attorneys and 64 percent of clients perform ‘very well’ or’very well’ during mediations, with 19 percent and 21 percent doing ‘adequately’ Anecdotally, mediators frequently cite lawyers’ performance as a reason why a Mediation Manchester will fail.
The top concerns observed by mediators were ‘over-reliance on advisors’ (48%), ‘group thought’ (41%), ‘avoidance’ (24%), and ‘interpersonal conflict within the team’ (14%). (14 percent ).
They also reported encountering ‘effective leadership of client negotiating team’ forty percent of the time and ‘excellent negotiation methods’ just twenty-four percent of the time.
In terms of preparation and involvement, it appears that participants still have some work to do.
In contrast, attorneys rated the performance of mediators as “very well” by 60%, “very well” by 21%, “sufficiently” by 14%, and “worse than adequately” by 5%.
Examples of frequent complaints were perceived prejudice on the part of the mediator and of individuals who “served as a messenger.”
Facilitative v evaluative
The paper discusses whether mediators function in a purely facilitative manner or whether they are also evaluative, as well as what they perceive the parties to desire. Although the majority of mediators claim to be facilitators, there is a suspicion that the parties would like evaluative Mediation Manchester mediators. Many appear to agree that as the day progresses, people may become more evaluative; nonetheless, there is a thin line between being genuinely evaluative and the more widespread practise of “robust reality testing.” This issue will be the subject of a subsequent report, which will include the opinions of respondents about the effectiveness of Mediation Manchester procedures.
Excluding “mega-cases,” the research predicts that the annual total value of mediated disputes is roughly £10.5 billion (up from £9 billion in 2014). In addition, it is estimated that mediations would save firms around £2.8 billion annually in terms of management time, damaged relationships, lost productivity, and legal bills. In terms of overall fee income, it is estimated that the entire worth of the Mediation Manchester profession is £26.5 million.